Tiger Shroff has sold his apartment in Mumbai’s Khar West for ₹9 crore, with the transaction registered on October 22, 2026. The sale price is about 18.3% higher than the ₹7.61 crore he paid for the home in 2018. Spread across roughly eight years, that works out to an annualized price increase of about 2.1% - a figure that needs context before it is read as an investment return.
The Khar West apartment sold for ₹9 crore
The apartment is on the ninth floor and has a reported carpet area of 1,291.14 square feet, alongside exclusive areas measuring 95.80 square feet. The sale also includes two covered parking spaces. The buyer paid ₹54 lakh in stamp duty, a substantial transaction cost associated with the purchase.
The reported sale price is the headline figure, but it does not by itself show the full cost of acquiring or owning the property. Nor does the stamp duty paid by the buyer establish what Shroff received after any applicable sale-related charges. The available details confirm the registered transaction and its stated price, not a complete account of either party’s costs.
From ₹7.61 crore to ₹9 crore: how the 2.1% figure is calculated
The difference between the reported purchase and sale prices is ₹1.39 crore. Compared with the original ₹7.61 crore purchase price, that is a gross increase of approximately 18.3% over the holding period.
The annual figure is calculated by annualizing the change over about eight years. In other words, it estimates the steady yearly growth rate that would take ₹7.61 crore to ₹9 crore across that period. The resulting compound annual growth rate is approximately 2.12%, commonly rounded to 2.1%.
This is a price comparison, not evidence that the property’s value rose by the same amount each year. It also does not adjust for inflation, which would affect how the increase translates into purchasing power over time. The calculation is useful for comparing the two stated prices across the holding period, but it should not be mistaken for a complete performance measure.
Why the price increase is not the same as net investment return
A net return would require more information than the purchase and sale prices. Depending on the circumstances, relevant items could include acquisition and sale expenses, taxes, maintenance, repairs, financing costs and any income earned from the property. The reported figures do not provide a full breakdown of these items, so they do not establish Shroff’s net profit or annual investment return.
The buyer’s ₹54 lakh stamp duty is also separate from the seller’s reported price appreciation. It illustrates that a property transaction can involve significant costs beyond the headline sale price, but it should not be subtracted from Shroff’s proceeds as though it were his expense.
The takeaway from the Tiger Shroff Khar apartment sale is therefore specific: the home changed hands for ₹9 crore, compared with a reported 2018 purchase price of ₹7.61 crore. The resulting 2.1% annualized rise describes the change in those prices only. Explore more Mumbai real estate coverage to compare recent transactions and neighborhood trends.